Pa oni ga i zovu vise kao program za podrsku: "Although Oracle Unbreakable Linux is touted as a "support programme", rather than a distribution," ne bas nova distribucija. Ima ljudi koji se drze poznate marke, iz racionalnih i iracionalnih razlgoa, ali ima i onih koji sve gledaju kroz novac, pa ce se tek kroz neko vreme videti rezultat ovog dogadjaja. Ima i korisnika koji koriste jos nesto osim Oracle, njima ce opet biti bolji univerzalni RH od strogo specijalizovanog Oracle Linuxa. Sve ima svoju cenu. Nadam se da necu biti dosadan, ali evo autor sajta Distrowatch je ove moje skromne ideje vrlo lepo elaborirao:
"Unfortunately, as much as your DistroWatch maintainer would love to welcome the big database company in the community of Linux solution providers, the manner in which Oracle entered the market leaves a distinctly sour taste in the mouth. The company, although reasonably open source friendly in the sense that some of its major products are compatible with Linux, has done very little to advance the Linux cause over the years. Its latest move to re-brand Red Hat's distribution and provide support for the "new" product brings zero innovation to the Linux market; in fact, it only serves to generate revenue for Oracle and, as some analysts believe, to potentially destroy Red Hat, Inc.
Contrast that to Red Hat and its contribution to the Linux community. While the New Carolina company is a business which has to answer to its stakeholders and which is strongly motivated by corporate profits, it has succeeded in generating revenue without sacrificing the spirit of open source software development. For over a decade Red Hat has been giving away its Red Hat Linux and Fedora Core distributions (complete with security updates during the lifetime of the products), it has been developing or helping with the development of many essential open source software components (e.g. Autoconf, glibc, LVM, etc.), and it has been employing some of the brightest open source software developers the world has seen. Whatever your experiences with Red Hat as a company, you have to admit that it has contributed an enormous amount of work to the pool of Free Software which we all share, irrespective of whether or not we use one of its end products.
Oracle, on the other hand, has brought very little to the world of Linux so far. Besides much negative sentiment which the database giant generated in the Linux community last week, the technical aspects of Oracle Unbreakable Linux are not particularly attractive either. Promising unspecified bug fixes on its web site is one thing, but showing a changelog with a list of bugs fixed by the company's engineers -- which has yet to materialise anywhere -- is an entirely different matter. Also, despite claims to the contrary, Oracle Unbreakable Linux is not a complete recompile of Red Hat's source packages and some software, notably Thunderbird, are missing from the distribution. Furthermore, what Oracle claims to be "Update 4", does not correspond to Red Hat's "Update 4"; as an example, Oracle's product contains older versions of the Linux kernel, Firefox, LVM, and many other packages. It also provides Ethereal, a package which is no longer maintained and which Red Hat had already replaced with Wireshark. Worse, no updates were reportedly available for any of these packages, despite that fact that some of them have known security issues! Unbreakable? Hardly!
Granted, these are still early days, so let's hope that Oracle will fix their product and find a way to contribute back to the Linux community. But for now, customers who need comprehensive support contracts for their Linux deployments should definitely choose Red Hat Enterprise Linux - even if it's more expensive that Oracle's support programme. As they say, you get what you pay for."
[Ovu poruku je menjao tdjokic dana 30.10.2006. u 11:15 GMT+1]
Dodao citat sa
www.distrowatch.com
[Ovu poruku je menjao tdjokic dana 30.10.2006. u 11:16 GMT+1]
Na svetu postoje samo 2 OS-a: 1. Mint, 2. svi ostali!