Citat:
popeye:
Mislim da ovde raspravljamo o sigurnosti Linuxa, bez poredjenja sa drugim (Windows) sistemima. Smatram da je sigurnost Linuxa postala dogma, a to ne vodi nicemu dobrom.
.
Nicem dobrom. Ta sigurnost i dogma o neranjivosti linuxa je stvarno pretjerana. Nasao sam jedan tutorial na netu o rootkitovima cisto da vidim sto je u biti to i kako se toga rijesit i u uvodu stoji
But...
There's always one. You should remember this: there is ALWAYS, at least, one
flaw. Just one hole through which a cracker could get into your system and
do things you would not do to your worst enemy's laptop.
Talking seriously, the Golden Rule of Security is: "Security is just a
state of mind". That means that you THINK you are secured. When you come
to believe such a thing, you automatically stop worrying. And that is a Bad
Thing (tm).
This is, I am sad to say, what a lot of system administrators do. And that is
something attackers tend to take advantage of.
Sumnjam da ovom quotu gore treba ista vise dodat. Uostalom vrijeme ce pokazat ko je u pravu, Admin koji vjeruje u neranjivost sistema il neki divljak koji ce nastojat opovrgnut tu cinjenicu a rezultati mogu biti katastrofalni.
Ja sam inace relativno novi u linux sviijetu al kad ljudi govore o neranjivosti necega onda je cak i laiku (meni (nadam se samo privremeno laik :) )) jasno da to nicem dobrom ne ide.